Pengaruh Linieritas Pendidikan Formal Guru terhadap Kompetensi Pedagogik di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Salafiyah Syafi’iyah 1 Sooko Mojokerto

Kata kunci: Linearity of Teacher Education, Teaching Experience, Pedagogic Mastery

Abstrak

This research aims to; knowing the linearity of formal education of teachers and teaching experience on pedagogic mastery, this study population is madrasah teacher ibtidaiyah in MI Salafiyah Syafi'iyah Sooko District Kab. Mojokerto. Data collection techniques used questionnaires and documentation. Validity and Reliability Test The instrument in this study measures the content vibility by studying the instrument based on the literature, while the validity and reliability of the test instrument instrument by disseminating the instrument in a sample similar to the object of research after it is processed by the test is valid and reliable.

There is a correlation between the linearity of formal teacher education and the teaching experience of pedagogical mastery in teaching (Spearman Correlataion). Models containing intercept are not suitable to be used in other words suitable model used is a model that contains the free variable (Final Model) according to table Model Fitting Information. The data used from the study are in accordance with the ordinal regression model used and this means that the model used is the most suitable model (Goodness-of-Fit). The result of Psudo R-Squere, this indicates that the variable Linearity of Formal Teacher Education and teaching experience can explain to pedagogic mastery or in other words the linearity of formal education of teacher and teaching experience influence to pedagogic mastery. With Estimates Parameter table, it can be explained that there is a tendency of linearity relationship of formal education of teacher and teaching experience to pedagogic mastery in teaching. From the results of the above test on the Test of Parallel Lines table, obtained ordinal model (proportional odds) gives a better data fit significantly compared with the general model.

Referensi

Adrian. (2004). Metode Mengajar Berdasarkan Tipologi Belajar Siswa.
Aqib, Zainal. 2002. Profesionalisme Guru dalam Pembelajaran. Surabaya: Cendekia Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya Bandung: Alfabeta
Buchari Alma dkk. Guru Profesional. Bandung: Alfabeta
Cece Wijaya. (1994). Kemampuan Dasar Guru Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar.
E Mulyasa. (2005). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Gaffar, M.F. (2007). ”Guru Sebagai Profesi”, Sertifikasi Guru. V, (1), 1-14
Hamalik, Oemar. 2003. Pendidikan Guru. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Hamzah B. Uno. (2007). Profesi Kependidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
Haryanto, Zeni dan Abdul Aziz. 2009. Sertifikasi Profesi Keguruan. Jakarta.Poliyama Widyapustaka Media.
Irvandy. (1993).Statistik Parametrik Dan Non Parametrik URL http://irvandy1993.blogspot.co.id/2013/05/statistik-parametrik-dan-non-parametrik.html
Moh. Uzer Usman. (2006) Menjadi Guru Profesional, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya
Muhsinin, Muhsinin, and Ilmin Navi. SELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGRA 3, no. 2 (July 25, 2017): 107-124. Accessed February 22, 2018.
Mujiono. 2010. Pengaruh Sertifikasi Guru terhadap Kinerja Guru MTs N Mlinjol Filial Trucuk Klaten. Skripsi, UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Muslich, Masnur. 2007. Sertifikasi Guru Menuju Profesionalisme Pendidik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Nawawi & Hadari. (1995). Adminsitrasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT. Toko Gunung Agung Negeri Kabupaten Wonosobo. Tesis. UNY.
Prasetyo, Bambang dan Lina Miftahul Jannah. 2012. Metode PenelitianKuantitatif: Teori dan Aplikasi. Jakarta. Rajawali Pers.
Roqib, Moh. & Nurfuadi. (2009). Kepribadian Guru. Yogyakarta: Grafindo Litera
Sanusi. A, dkk. 1991. Studi Pengembangan Model Pendidikan Profesional Tenaga Kependidikan. Depdikbud
Sudarwan Danim . (2010). Profesionalisme dan Etika Profesi Guru. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supriyanto, Didik. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI 1, no. 1 (March 18, 2014): 1-14. Accessed February 22, 2018. http://jurnal.stitnualhikmah.ac.id/index.php/modeling/article/view/29.
Supriyanto, Didik. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI 2, no. 2 (September 3, 2015): 66-75. Accessed January 24, 2018. http://jurnal.stitnualhikmah.ac.id/index.php/modeling/article/view/67.
Suryati, Wawat. 2011. Profesi Kependidikan. Bandar Lampung. Lembaga Penerbit STKIP Bandar Lampung.
Suwaluyo. 1988. Pengalaman Mengajar Guru Profesional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Suwarto, Tok. 2014. Kompetensi Profesional Guru Pasca-sertifikasi Masih Lemah. Pikiran Rakyat.
Syaiful Sagala. 2008. Kemampuan Profesional Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
Truko Triyatno. (2010). Dampak sertifikasi guru terhadap kinerja guru IPA di SMP
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Wirawan. 2002. Evaluasi Teori Model Standar Aplikasi dan Profesi Jakarta: Uhamka Press.
Yamin, Martinis. Profesionalisasi Guru dan Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi, Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press, Cet 1 2006
Yamin, Martinis. Sertifikasi Profesi Keguruan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press, 2006.
Diterbitkan
2018-03-05
Bentuk Sitasi
Wijaya, F., & Supriyanto, D. (2018, March 5). Pengaruh Linieritas Pendidikan Formal Guru terhadap Kompetensi Pedagogik di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Salafiyah Syafi’iyah 1 Sooko Mojokerto. PROCEEDING: The Annual International Conference on Islamic Education, 3(2), 96-107. Retrieved from http://jurnal.stitnualhikmah.ac.id/index.php/proceedings/article/view/180
Section
Artikel