Efektifitas Active Learning pada Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Al Fithrah Surabaya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69896/modeling.v3i2.254Keywords:
Active Learning, Social Studies (IPS)Abstract
The Subject study of this research is active learning in the learning of Social Sciences implemented in Islamic Elementary School (MI) neighborhood of Al fithrah Surabaya. In this case, researchers wanted to find active learning which is implemented in Fourth grade of Islamic Elementary School Al fithrah Surabaya, and wanted to know the effectiveness of active learning that is implemented at Fourth grade of Islamic Elementary School Al Fithrah Surabaya.
The problems of this research is how the implementation of active learning in teaching Social Sciences in MI Al fithrah Surabaya, as well as how the effectiveness of active learning in teaching Social Sciences in MI Al fithrah Surabaya.
This study is an experimental research type with quantitative research approach, in which researchers apply Parametric Test Statistics for research ratio data (numeric data). While the statistical test process using a technique unpaired T test sample because there is different treatment of one of the sampling. The data collection include observation, interviews, documentary studies and tests on the sample. In the table the results of two independent samples t test, this research produced significant value of 0.00. Can be explained that 0.000 <0.01, which means that H0 was rejected while H1 was accepted. The big difference in variance data on both samples showed that the application of active learning methods affect the value of Mid Semester Tes (UTS) social studies in other words there is the effectiveness of active learning methods to improve and increase the ability of students in social studies.
Downloads
References
Alexander Wibowo, “ Pembelajaran Aktif-Reflektif †dalam http://alexjwibowo.blogspot.com. Diakses pada tanggal (27 April 2010). Dapat pula dilihat pada Suryo Subroto, Tata Laksana Kurikulum (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1990), 90-93.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. Manajemen Pengajaran Secara Manusiawi, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1993.
Depdiknas, Penyelenggara School Reform dalam Konteks MPMBS di SMU, Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Umum,Dirjen Dikdasmen, 2002.
Djamarah,Syaiful Bahri. Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.
Fathurrohman, Pupuh & M. Sobry Sutikno. Strategi Belajar Mengajar Melalui Penanaman Konsep Umum & Konsep Islami. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2007.
Ginting, Abdurrahman. Esensi Praktis Belajar & Pembelajaran Disiapkan Untuk Pendidikan Profesi dan sertifikasi Guru-Dosen. Bandung: Humaniora, 2008.
Hisyam Zaini, Bermawy Munthe & Sekar Ayu Aryani, Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif (Yogjakarta: CTSD IAIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2007), xvi.
Maksum, Madrasah, Sejarah dan Perkembangannya, Jakarta: Logos,Wacana Ilmu,1999.
Maria Ulfa “Macam-macam Metode Pembelajaranâ€,http://mariaulfah15.multiply.com(2 April 2008).
Martiningsih “Macam-macam Metode Pembelajaran†dalam http://martiningsih.blogspot.com (Desember 2007)
Menang Pusat. Pendidikan IPS di SD (Bandung: PPPPTK TK dan PLB, 2007.
Muhaimin, Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Surabaya: Citra Media, 1996.
Muhibbin Syah, Psikologi Belajar, Jakarta: Logos, 1999.
Mulyasa, E, Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2002.
_________, Pembelajaran dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
__________, Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Munawir, Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Ponorogo, Lembaga Penerbitan Karya Ilmiah STAIN Ponorogo, 1999.
Nana Sudjana, Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Sinar Algesindo, 1995.
Nasution, Berbagai Pendekatan Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 1995.
Pristiadi Utomo, Metode Pembelajaran Inquiry-Discovery, 2007 http://ILMUWAN-MUDA. worldpress/Learning/mht.21 Nopember 2008.
Roestiyah, Didaktik Metodik, Jakarta; Bumi Aksara,1994.
_________, Masalah-masalah Keguruan, Jakarta; Bumi Aksara,1989.







