Perkembangan dan Tantangan Ilmu Administrasi di Era Globalisasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69896/modeling.v11i1.2526Keywords:
Ilmu Administrasi, Globalisasi, Kepemimpinan, Kebijakan Publik, Inovasi TeknologiAbstract
Ilmu administrasi sebagai disiplin ilmu telah berkembang pesat sejak awal kemunculannya dan kini memainkan peran krusial dalam organisasi publik maupun swasta. Artikel ini membahas perkembangan ilmu administrasi, konsep-konsep utama, serta tantangan yang dihadapi di era globalisasi. Dalam konteks yang lebih luas, penelitian ini menyoroti bagaimana faktor kepemimpinan, kebijakan publik, dan inovasi teknologi membentuk dinamika administrasi modern. Melalui tinjauan literatur dan analisis komparatif, artikel ini mengidentifikasi tren masa depan yang akan memengaruhi praktik administrasi di tingkat global.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059-1066.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2015). The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664-672.
Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 491-502.
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132-140.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
Kettl, D. F. (2005). The global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Public Management Review, 7(4), 515-526.
Meier, K. J., O'Toole, L. J., Jr., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2007). Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: Testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 357-377.
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135-158.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Continuity and change in public policy and management. Public Management Review, 13(2), 223-243.
Rainey, H. G., & Chun, Y. H. (2007). Public and private management compared. The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, 72(1), 72-102.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667.
Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527-540.
Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., & Brewer, G. A. (2010). Public management and performance: Research directions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(suppl_1), i201-i207.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059-1066.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2015). The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664-672.
Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 491-502.
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132-140.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
Kettl, D. F. (2005). The global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Public Management Review, 7(4), 515-526.
Meier, K. J., O'Toole, L. J., Jr., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2007). Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: Testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 357-377.
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135-158.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Continuity and change in public policy and management. Public Management Review, 13(2), 223-243.
Rainey, H. G., & Chun, Y. H. (2007). Public and private management compared. The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, 72(1), 72-102.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667.
Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527-540.
Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., & Brewer, G. A. (2010). Public management and performance: Research directions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(suppl_1), i201-i207.
Downloads
Published
31-03-2024
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
“Perkembangan Dan Tantangan Ilmu Administrasi Di Era Globalisasi”. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI 11, no. 1 (March 31, 2024): 1092–1120. Accessed May 6, 2026. http://jurnal.stitnualhikmah.ac.id/index.php/modeling/article/view/2526.
